FAIGIN BLOGS
  • HOME
  • FACE BLOG
    • FACE BLOG INDEX >
      • FACIAL ELEMENTS
      • FACIAL EXPRESSIONS
      • more FACES
  • ART BLOG
    • ART REVIEWS INDEX
  • CONTACT
  • HOME
  • FACE BLOG
    • FACE BLOG INDEX >
      • FACIAL ELEMENTS
      • FACIAL EXPRESSIONS
      • more FACES
  • ART BLOG
    • ART REVIEWS INDEX
  • CONTACT

Facial Expressions: JOY

7/1/2018

0 Comments

 

DEFROSTING
​Martha's Smile

KEY CONCEPT: Realistic smiles are hard to pull off; stylized smiles are easy.
Picture
Picture
Figures 1 & 2. Domestic goddess and lifestyle maven Martha Stewart poses with painter Will Cotton for her portrait on the cover of her eponymous "Living" magazine's 25th Anniversary issue. Her smile in the photo is much better than the one in the painting. What went wrong?
Painter Will Cotton specializes in virtual “eye candy”-- photo-realist portrayals of beautiful women adorned or surrounded with sugary confections, such as cotton candy, cookies or cakes. He was a natural choice for Martha Stewart’s iconic portrait, "Visions of Sugar,"  on the cover of the 25th anniversary edition of her magazine. As you can see in Figure 2, Martha poses in a surreal winter wonderland where the “trees” are giant meringues or cookies coated with sugar; even Martha's clothing and hat are "iced."

​The resulting youthful portrait (Figure 3) is successful by most standards. However, Martha’s smile has a cool, slightly “off” quality, the result of Cotton’s misinterpretation of certain details in his source photograph (similar to Figure 1). My corrections, shown in Figures 5 and 6, improve the warmth and realism of Martha's smile by applying very subtle changes to the eyes and cheeks.  
​
Picture
Picture
Figures 3 & 4. Martha's Smile as painted by Will Cotton. On the right, I have highlighted the elements of Martha's smiling face which could be improved, as shown below.
Picture
Picture
Figures 5 & 6. Defrosting Martha's Smile. The original smiling Martha is somewhat stiff and unnatural.  These two variations of her painted portrait, manipulated digitally by the author, are warmer and more human.
Stylized characters have one great advantage over realistic ones - viewers have double standards. As every portrait artist knows, clients can get fussed over the tiniest details in a portrait painting, and the more realistic the portrayal, the more opportunity for finding fault.
Cartoon characters, on the other hand, get a pass from the strict criteria we apply to literal renderings. Once an observer determines that a face is humanoid rather than human, we are completely forgiving of distortions or non-anatomical elements that would be otherwise rejected.
​
Take the case of the smile. One of the reasons professional portrait artists so rarely portray smiles is the minefield this expression can present. To say that viewers can be hyper-critical of a painted smile is an understatement; we can detect if it is insincere, lopsided, or just wrong looking, and better no expression than a smile badly rendered. Cartoon characters like Sponge Bob, Anna, and Woody, by contrast, get a pass as long as their smiles are simply recognizable, and the more stylized the character gets, the looser our criteria for recognition. At the outer limits of exaggeration and distortion, any mouth that is vaguely trapezoidal and wider at the top than the bottom will read as happy, and artists take full advantage of that creative freedom.

I present here a gallery of smiles, starting with the very slightly flawed portrait of Martha Stewart, as shown above, to animated and cartoon characters from a bit stylized to radically reinvented. ​
Picture

​Figure 7.  Elsa has a Slightly Stylized Smile.
 This image is a fan’s version of Disney’s Elsa and it works, although the portrait includes several details which would ruin a more realistic smile. The mouth isn’t open wide enough, the eyelids are in their neutral, rather than smiling, position, and the cheeks have no bulging or creasing at all. Luckily for the animators,  Elsa is in the “humanoid” category, where our usual standards are suspended.
Picture
Picture
​Figures 8 (left). Woody has a More Stylized Smile.  Disney's Elsa is meant to be a simplified human; Pixar's Woody is conceived of as an animated toy. To prove that Woody's non-literal smile  (which works terrifically well for him) does not work on a human face, check out Figure 9.
​Figure 9 (right). Martha looks demented with Woody's Smile! I’ve re-done Martha's smile using the elements I highlighted for Woody. The result is a train wreck of a smile for Martha, or any literal depiction of a face. Realistic smiles must play by the rules.
Picture
Figure 10. Spongebob and his buddies have Even More Stylized Smiles. This array of cartoon characters presents a Master Class in ways to make very stylized characters look happy. Note the radical difference in shape between Patrick and Sandy’s smile (Patrick’s is almost square), the missing, or almost missing teeth, and  Plankton’s dental grid. Note also the very sophisticated suggestions of cheek bulges in nearly every character (particularly Patrick and Bob), a very nice detail.
Picture
​Figure 11. This happy creature has the Most Stylized Smile. This face has a mouth that is virtually rectangular (smiles are bows or trapezoids), but the slight bowing of the upper edge, and the slight extra width of the upper margin compared to the lower, is all that’s needed to make the expression clear.  The extended and arced upper lip line is a helpful addition.
What should be your key takeaway from my commentary? Animators and cartoonists, be encouraged that you can easily “sell” your smiles. Portrait painters, remember that prudence is the better part of valor and stick to neutral, unless you are a smile expert.

CREDITS: 
Figure 1. 
Photograph of Martha Stewart & Will Cotton by Mike Krautter; Figure 2. Martha Stewart Living 25th Anniversary Collector's Edition magazine cover, December 2015/January 2016;  Figures 3 & 4. Close-up of Martha Stewart portrait, "Visions of Sugar," painted by Will Cotton;  Figures 5, 6 & 9. Photo of Martha Stewart portrait manipulated by author; Figure 7. Elsa's portrait image from www.fanpop.com; Figure 8. Image of Woody from Toy Story, produced by Pixar Animation Studios for Walt Disney Pictures and directed by John Lasseter, 1995; Figure 10. Spongebob characters found on www.Quiztron.com ; ​Figure 11. Free clip art of squid smiling.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    FAIGIN FACE BLOG

    So many faces. So many ways to express emotions. Faigin examines facial expressions in movie stills, cartoons, fine art, illustrations and photographs and shares his insightful analyses in his monthly blog.​

    FACE BLOG INDEX
    with hyperlinks by topics.

    FACE BLOG ARCHIVE:

    September 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly