FAIGIN BLOGS
  • HOME
  • FACE BLOG
    • FACE BLOG INDEX >
      • FACIAL ELEMENTS
      • FACIAL EXPRESSIONS
      • more FACES
  • ART BLOG
    • ART REVIEWS INDEX
  • CONTACT
  • HOME
  • FACE BLOG
    • FACE BLOG INDEX >
      • FACIAL ELEMENTS
      • FACIAL EXPRESSIONS
      • more FACES
  • ART BLOG
    • ART REVIEWS INDEX
  • CONTACT

Patrick Holderfield at James Harris Gallery - January 2004

1/1/2004

0 Comments

 
Picture
An important part of the local arts landscape are several smaller galleries that specialize in showing work that is edgy, experimental, and challenging. Dealers who show such work must be prepared to cultivate and educate a clientele — making a commercial go of selling such art is never easy. In Seattle, one of the most respected and lively of these spaces is the James Harris Gallery in Pioneer Square, just across the street from the much larger and more venerable showcase of the avant-garde, Greg Kucera. This month’s exhibition at the Harris Gallery, highlighting the work of Seattle artist Patrick Holderfield is, true to form, very one-of-a-kind. Here with our review is KUOW art critic, Gary Faigin.

The explosion of the space shuttle Challenger, and the collapse of the World Trade Center towers are just two recent traumas that have called into question both our collective sense of security, and our trust in technology. Two hundred years ago, the sinking of the French sailing ship Medusa and the lingering, lurid death of most of its crew on a tiny raft, created a similar sense of unease in Europe. The disaster was immortalized in one of the epic paintings of art history, Gericault’s colossal, "Raft of the Medusa," now at the Louvre.
The very inventive Patrick Holderfield has chosen to tap into this shared communal anxiety by loosely basing his current work on the Gericault painting. The operative word here is “loosely” — in general, Holderfield treats the older painting as a point of departure, rather than a literal source. In fact, reproductions of the painting are nowhere to be seen, at the artist’s request.

Closest to the original painting is an impressive, energetic installation that fills one corner of the tiny gallery, both an act of homage and an independent work of art. At the base of the installation is a shelf of assorted, time-weathered wooden beams, a clear reference to the crude, timbered raft that is the centerpiece of the painting. Cascading off this shelf, in a perhaps too-literal suggestion of death and gore, is a thick, flesh-like resin waterfall oozing onto the gallery floor.

Rising above this assembly, several dozen bright yellow planks angle upwards in space, the whole forming a very loose compositional pyramid — a stand-in for the pyramid-like grouping of mast and victims that is the centerpiece of the Gericault. Here and there, flying lumber seems to slice clear through the gallery walls. Off to one side, yellow planks are replaced by outline drawings of still more timbers, which continue to tumble through space in two dimensions, rather than three.

The entire wooden display is a sort of anti-construction. Though the pieces are linked in what appears to be structural ways, nothing is truly supported, nothing looks even remotely stable.

Swirling lumber, floating in air but still retaining some semblance of pattern and structure, is, in fact, a recurring theme of the show. Along these lines is a sequence of four drawings depicting a flying formation of timbers, progressively assembling and disassembling. Holderfield is a superb draughtsman, and the contrast here between the precise, architectural quality of the drawings, and the sense of emerging chaos is particularly effective.

Even more striking are the several large-format, mixed media drawings in the main gallery. Here Holderfield really comes into his own, skillfully contrasting tiny, gracefully rendered forms with transparent clouds of brightly colored wash and opaque blobs of jet-black ink. Swirling, highly detailed areas are played off against huge swaths of plain white space — subtleties that make the drawings nearly impossible to appreciate in reproduction, but very rewarding up close.

Looking carefully at one drawing, for example, a group of gnarly black stems seems to end in tiny, floral shapes. The stems are arranged in a circle, radiating outwards like spokes of a wheel. Barely visible underneath and alongside are fragments of other plant and animal forms. These organic elements are underlain in turn by mysterious constructions of timber, here more orderly and complex than elsewhere, but still with no apparent function or logic. Other drawings feature enigmatic, multicolored explosions, turbulent regions from which ink blots streak upwards, and floating, twisting planks cascade down. The unease here is both physical and psychic, restlessness given compelling form.

The original "Raft of the Medusa" was painted in an era where most art celebrated the classical past, or romanticized the present. By contrast, anxiety, chaos and destruction is, unfortunately, a recurrent theme in the art of our troubled times.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    FAIGIN ART REVIEWS

    ARCHIVES

    September 2024
    August 2024
    February 2023
    February 2022
    June 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    October 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    April 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004
    December 2003
    November 2003
    October 2003
    September 2003
    July 2003
    May 2003
    April 2003
    March 2003
    February 2003
    January 2003
    December 2002
    October 2002
    September 2002
    August 2002
    July 2002
    June 2002
    May 2002
    April 2002
    March 2002
    February 2002
    January 2002
    December 2001
    November 2001
    October 2001
    September 2001
    August 2001
    July 2001
    June 2001
    May 2001
    April 2001
    March 2001
    February 2001
    January 2001
    December 2000
    November 2000
    October 2000
    December 1993

Proudly powered by Weebly