FAIGIN BLOGS
  • HOME
  • FACE BLOG
    • FACE BLOG INDEX >
      • FACIAL ELEMENTS
      • FACIAL EXPRESSIONS
      • more FACES
  • ART BLOG
    • ART REVIEWS INDEX
  • CONTACT
  • HOME
  • FACE BLOG
    • FACE BLOG INDEX >
      • FACIAL ELEMENTS
      • FACIAL EXPRESSIONS
      • more FACES
  • ART BLOG
    • ART REVIEWS INDEX
  • CONTACT

"MetaphorM" at Suyama Space - June 2008

6/1/2008

0 Comments

 
Picture
Carolyn Healy + John Phillip

A century-old former stables in Belltown with its original wooden truss ceiling and plank floor, has become a major local showcase for installation art.  The gallery, called Suyama Space, is the project of a local architectural firm, and shares part of their office.  This summer’s exhibition, a meditation on light and structure by Philadelphia artists Carolyn Healy and John Phillips, has just opened after five weeks of installation.  Joining us to talk about this piece is KUOW art critic, Gary Faigin.

From what I can gather from the artist’s website, the Suyama installation is quite different in nature from many of their earlier pieces: dark, complicated-looking agglomerations of metallic found objects bombarded by flashy, colored video projections, installed in indoor settings where the only light was that the artists provided.
Suyama Space is something else entirely.  Huge skylights in the barn-like roof flood the courtyard-sized interior with daylight.  On clear days moving panels of shaped sunlight flow across walls and floors, a projection of windows, joists, and trusses.   The architect George Suyama was so fascinated with the building’s natural light that he installed an oculus on a west-facing wall so that the lit trace of the sun’s course through the seasons could be tracked and noted; it falls on a particular central wall, for example, at the summer solstice.

Shadows, structure, and space all find their echo in the Healy/Phillips installation MetaphorM, a visually lightweight, complex work, with a number of discrete and interacting elements.  That it might be a bit too complex is an element to be considered a bit further on, but the artists are nothing if not ambitious.  Each plays a particular role in their collaboration: Healy creates the sculptures, while Phillips, working separately, creates a complementary program of sound and video projections. 

 Healy’s Suyama sculpture consists of pieces that float rather than rest in the space, suspended from the ceiling and touching neither floor nor walls.  Her work is a sort of tracery, a series of linear structures suggestive of architectural drawings, models, and diagrams.  The largest elements are huge open frames made up of skinny steel rods, which act as both room dividers and commentaries on the space.  One set of these frames hangs alongside the room’s actual walls, creating a sort of virtual room within the room.  The frames enclosed diagonal lines and angular shapes that are meant to echo those of the trusses above – elevation views, as it were, though purposely not literal in detail.  In the middle of the room hang several giant box frames, like model houses or towers with pitched roofs partly unfolded and facing downwards, just above the floor.  These hanging frames made me think of a playground full of steel climbing structures; they spotlight the graceful way that built structure and gravitational force interact. 

The other major sculptural element of the installation also refers to gravity and equilibrium. Looping across the ceiling is a network of cables, pulleys, and ropes, upon which various discard industrial objects are suspended like bells or counterweights.  These metal disks, hooks, balls, and rings hang at regular intervals, their occasional bright paint providing the only color note in an otherwise monochromatic piece.   Though this mechanical system is fixed in place, its potential activity is suggested by the sound loop that occasionally murmurs in the background with the noise of metal objects being struck, the low-pitched clanging of a factory at work.  

The final piece of the installation are three video projections.  Two of the projectors cast shadows of various hanging elements on large wall-mounted screens.  As one watches, other shadows mingle with the real ones, sometimes like a piece of the shadow breaking off from the rest and drifting off on its own, and other times an independent event with moving shapes with visual affinities to those already there.  The third projection, smaller and circular, is having its own conversation, featuring a series of circle-based, fractured geometries slowly morphing from one configuration to another.  

There’s a very far-reaching impetus behind this installation, the visual art equivalent of Wagner’s Gesamtkunstwerk – the idea of opera as a “total, integrated, or complete artwork” combining multiple art forms.  Here, instead of linking music, theatre, set, and costume, the artists strive for the integration of drawing (the large 2D metal frames), sculpture (the large box frames and suspensions), video, and sound.  Here the “plot” which animates the work isn’t driven by romance or mythology, but the dynamics and atmospherics of a particular space.  Instead of the “The Flying Dutchman”, we have the “Triumph of the Truss”.

 Does MetaphorM work as an example of fully-integrated art?  Does it stimulate an appreciation of Suyama Space deeper and richer than the richness of the space unadorned?  Does it inspire energetic meditations on the interactions of structure and light, tension and balance, enclosure and transparency?  Do the various components reinforce each other, or merely coexist? 

Not really, no, yes, and sometimes. 

MetaphorM is a collection of frames, objects, and projections.  We perceive it as multiple separate elements rather than a coherent whole.  It doesn’t have enough visual weight to provide a total experience nearly as strong as that of simply being in the space.  It’s full of interesting ideas, particularly about light, and nature of line: lines of force, lines that can enclose volume, lines that lead the eye through space, but there are too many ideas for one piece to comfortably handle – it’s a bit exhausting. 

The connection between the hanging frames and their shadows – real, projected, and computer generated – is the most successful interaction between the various components.  There’s something genuinely mysterious about shadows taking on a life of their own, moving and changing independently of the objects casting them – the Peter Pan Effect.   And speaking of Peter Pan, the artist’s sense of playfulness and invention is the best thing going for the exhibition as a whole, a sort of jungle gym for the mind.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    FAIGIN ART REVIEWS

    ARCHIVES

    September 2024
    August 2024
    February 2023
    February 2022
    June 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    October 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    April 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004
    December 2003
    November 2003
    October 2003
    September 2003
    July 2003
    May 2003
    April 2003
    March 2003
    February 2003
    January 2003
    December 2002
    October 2002
    September 2002
    August 2002
    July 2002
    June 2002
    May 2002
    April 2002
    March 2002
    February 2002
    January 2002
    December 2001
    November 2001
    October 2001
    September 2001
    August 2001
    July 2001
    June 2001
    May 2001
    April 2001
    March 2001
    February 2001
    January 2001
    December 2000
    November 2000
    October 2000
    December 1993

Proudly powered by Weebly