FAIGIN BLOGS
  • HOME
  • FACE BLOG
    • FACE BLOG INDEX >
      • FACIAL ELEMENTS
      • FACIAL EXPRESSIONS
      • more FACES
  • ART BLOG
    • ART REVIEWS INDEX
  • CONTACT
  • HOME
  • FACE BLOG
    • FACE BLOG INDEX >
      • FACIAL ELEMENTS
      • FACIAL EXPRESSIONS
      • more FACES
  • ART BLOG
    • ART REVIEWS INDEX
  • CONTACT

James Martin at Foster White Gallery - January 2008

1/1/2008

0 Comments

 
Picture
Edmonds-based painter James Martin occupies a unique position in the world of Northwest art.   Widely exhibited and discussed early in his career, his reputation and prices have yet to recover from the death of his first art dealer in 1966.   Nonetheless, Martin has continued to pour out his trademark zany images unabated, and his current show in Pioneer Square contains no less than 105 paintings, most done in the last year.   Joining us with his comments on this true Northwest original is our art critic, Gary Faigin. 


To be honest, I have not reviewed a Martin show up until now because I was put off by his work. I found it messy, awkward, and repetitive, and I had trouble getting past its cheapness – both in the materials that the artist chooses to use (mottled-looking gouache painted on wrinkled, non-archival Kraft paper), and in the rock-bottom prices that it sells for. In the current show, there are prices as low as $650 for a finished work, which is a far lower price than any other artist of similar seniority. Is the gallery hedging its bets by promoting Martin as a latter-day Northwest master, but keeping his prices low because people might resist paying more for such slapdash-looking work?  In an art world where money is a major preoccupation of both sellers and buyers, it is hard not to tie cost to value, as arbitrary as that relationship might sometimes be.  

However, after reading up on Martin, it seems more likely that the key to the technique/price/value conundrum is the artist himself, whose attitude towards such matters as degree of finish, longevity, and the economics of the art marketplace is defiantly casual, even dismissive.   He seems to have made the conscious choice to work small (15” x 20” is about average), quick, and cheap as a way of being an Artist Outside the Art World, an implicit criticism of those on the inside who are snobbish, precious, and over-sophisticated, not to mention money-grubbing.  

It is hard to imagine any artist who would look good with so many rapid-fire, unedited pictures on view in one place at one time.   Of the hundred-odd images in the show, I would immediately cut out at least thirty, particularly the nearly identical compositions with a beat-up car in profile and an interchangeable cast of characters taking exactly the same poses.  Sure it’s amusing to see Christ acting the part of a grease-pit mechanic (along with the artist in a Mickey Mouse cap at the other end of the car), but it loses something when a nearby picture simply swaps him out for a naked girl. Can such loaded images really be shuffled around that easily, like so many Tarot cards?  I’d also edit out several of the School of Chagall floating figure groups, remove a few lions, and cull several still lives and pianos.  

Of the dozens of works that would remain on view after my thinning, we’d still be left with a very mixed bag: full of intriguing parts, but often perplexing in overall effect. What I like the best about Martin is his uninhibited energy and his narrative ambitions - he takes on very interesting subject matter, but his reach frequently outpaces his grasp.

Take the painting "On the Steps of La Californie," for example. It’s an homage to the two greatest masters of Spanish painting, Velazquez and Picasso.   Martin’s picture is vaguely similar in composition and palette to Picasso’s painting of the interior of "La Californie,"his Cannes studio, but here we’re on the outside rather than the inside.   Flitting about is a cast of characters drawn from "Las Meninas," and Picasso’s late-career takeoff on "Las Meninas."  Between Velazquez’s royal dwarf and Picasso’s version of the Princess stands the sketchy figure of a Spanish nun.   Most intriguingly, reaching out of a mysterious void to one side of the studio, we see what looks to be the black-clad arm of Velazquez himself, his empty hand waving at the air, beckoning from beyond.

It’s a sort of a buddy picture, with the artist making it clear that he’s on good terms with his erstwhile predecessors, reinterpreting them in a vaguely expressionist style like Ensor or Chagall, only with much messier paint.   Such borrowings, in fact, are a major theme in Martin’s work; the current show contains a version (one of many) of Van Gogh’s room, with the addition of a temptress in a blue dress and a duck, as well as a mystic sky a la Morris Graves, a Mona Lisa, and many more appearances by various characters from Velazquez.   But the La Californie painting doesn’t go anywhere with its mélange of styles and references – being buddies isn’t the same as making an interesting point, which here seems to be the fun of bringing dead artists back to life.

I want to like these paintings better than I do.  Martin is full of ideas, and he’s willing to try nearly anything.  He channels a huge variety of sources – cartoons, modern art, television, literature and music (Siegfried and Proust make an appearance) – and his color is frequently electric.   My favorite picture in the show is also the simplest.    A self-portrait entitled the "Wooly Award," the artist’s lemon yellow shirt fills most of the picture.   Pinned to his enormous chest is a medal with the image of a wooly mammoth, apparently one of the artist’s current preoccupations.  Martin himself, with shaggy white hair and bird, looks not at us but off to one side at a robin perched on his shoulder, his lips pursed in something between a whistle and a smile.  It’s a picture of a man more comfortable in his imagined world than in ours, a world where he can take on the role of impresario and ringmaster, living vicariously through his animal alter egos and imaginary girlfriends.

Sheila Farr, art critic of the Seattle Times, has been Martin’s main champion in recent years.  In 2001 her monograph on the artist, she refers to his work as “deliciously beautiful”.   Personally, I’m not able to get through to the beauty past the debris of Martin’s wobbly technique and endless recycling of the same ideas.   It’s almost a great story, but not quite, in spite of the avid collectors snapping up dozens of paintings at bargain-basement prices.   Someday, a smart curator will cull the gems and shelf the rest, and we’ll all have a great time celebrating the genius of our home-grown hero.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    FAIGIN ART REVIEWS

    ARCHIVES

    September 2024
    August 2024
    February 2023
    February 2022
    June 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    October 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    April 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004
    December 2003
    November 2003
    October 2003
    September 2003
    July 2003
    May 2003
    April 2003
    March 2003
    February 2003
    January 2003
    December 2002
    October 2002
    September 2002
    August 2002
    July 2002
    June 2002
    May 2002
    April 2002
    March 2002
    February 2002
    January 2002
    December 2001
    November 2001
    October 2001
    September 2001
    August 2001
    July 2001
    June 2001
    May 2001
    April 2001
    March 2001
    February 2001
    January 2001
    December 2000
    November 2000
    October 2000
    December 1993

Proudly powered by Weebly