FAIGIN BLOGS
  • HOME
  • FACE BLOG
    • FACE BLOG INDEX >
      • FACIAL ELEMENTS
      • FACIAL EXPRESSIONS
      • more FACES
  • ART BLOG
    • ART REVIEWS INDEX
  • CONTACT
  • HOME
  • FACE BLOG
    • FACE BLOG INDEX >
      • FACIAL ELEMENTS
      • FACIAL EXPRESSIONS
      • more FACES
  • ART BLOG
    • ART REVIEWS INDEX
  • CONTACT

Isaac Layman at Lawrimore Project - July 2010

7/1/2010

0 Comments

 
Picture
The mural-sized photographs of Issac Layman are all produced in his modest Green Lake home.  And while his wife and two young children do not appear in the pictures, they are by necessity part of his project.  Each time Layman chooses a subject, like the basement dryer, the kitchen sink, or the living room bookcase -  the room in question is disabled for the duration of the photo shoot, a complex, high-tech process that can take as long as a month to complete.

The results of Layman's most recent work are currently on view at Lawrimore Project, and KUOW art critic, Gary Faigin, joins us with his comments.

In both his imagery and his approach, Issac Layman could not be more different.  Compared to “decisive moment” photographers like Bresson, his studio practice is much more that of the painter or sculptor.   Besides making allusions in his work to landmark modernists  like Jackson Pollock and Mark Rothko (amongst others), Layman shares with the painters the idea that an image is something built up over time rather than simply framed and captured.  The final product is thus entirely the result of the artist’s intention and control, rather than relying to some degree on the happy accident.

Layman takes this idea of control and intentionality to practical extremes.  One image in the current show, "Cabinet," required a month of labor and several hundred separate exposures; another involved shattering and photographing a set of favorite glasses from Cabinet so he could investigate them in a different, but equally rigorous way.  Each image in the exhibition seems to be the result of a similarly demanding and original process, and each is presented at a scale and in a manner that suggests that its subject has been somehow elevated from the mundane to the sublime.   

Take "Fireplace ", one of the most straightforward image in the show.  "Fireplace" is on one level a simple portrait of the family hearth, presented at actual size and across from the gallery’s own fireplace, but the contrast with the other images on view is striking.  In "Fireplace" a stark, white brick wall frames a dark, soot-stained firebox, the image composed with the same frontal, symmetrical arrangement as all the other domestic imagery on view - the Everyday Object as Icon.  But the other domestic Icons are carefully shot and lit so that they challenge us with wall-to-wall texture and non-stop information; here the upper reaches of the interior is allowed to fade to utter blackness in a way that in the context of the show is truly alarming – there is nothing there.  Nothing, in an exhibit full of so many precisely detailed somethings. 

It’s fitting that Layman should use a fireplace, with its hidden link to the sky and its pattern of dark framed by light, to conjure up thoughts and feelings about the Void, with fire and mystery as its accompaniments.  It is a powerful image, elegiac and compelling.  We may not want to think about that portal, but we can’t stop looking at it.

The nearby photograph "Oven," on the other hand, is a more typical deadpan portrait, reminding us of hyper-real images of sinks and stereos from earlier shows.   Compared to the moody "Fireplace," "Oven" is almost cheerful, or at any rate upbeat, where the thematic climax rises up to white instead of fading to black.  The empty electric oven has been brightly, evenly lit and (one presumes) cleaned up for the occasion, the back panel glowing silver against the side wall’s dark grey.  "Oven" is the product of Layman’s combining multiple images – each featuring an ultra-high focus, narrow slice of the subject’s full depth - so that the final digital print presents a detailed, mechanically precise view of the subject beyond the reach of ordinary seeing or photography.  I say that partly because that’s what I’ve been told, but how much are we really aware that images like "Oven" are impossible outside of Layman’s particular process, and how much difference does it make to our experience? 

"Oven" is composed, printed, and presented in a manner that is at least as important to the final effect as the elaborate technique.  It’s fully 5 feet across (larger than life), and hung by itself in the gallery’s media room where we look at it from bleachers, like a spectacle.  The image itself plays with the idea of theatre, suggesting a giant TV screen in a stadium, or a series of pictures within pictures.  The fact that all this fuss is about a kitchen appliance lends an agreeable air of irony to the enterprise, but the extraordinary clarity of each level of depth affects us on a much less conscious level, a precision and crispness we associate with large format cameras (like Layman uses) in general even without the multiple layers here in play.

The extraordinary doorknob close-up entitled "Basement" uses Layman’s digital sleight-of-hand to much more obvious effect.  Simplicity itself, the image presents us an enormous faceted glass door handle with an old-fashioned keyhole below in a pure white surround, like a giant nose and mouth hovering in space.  Layman has here selectively allowed certain blurred layers on the image to coexist with clear ones, like the fuzzy keyhole occupying an indeterminate place in the background.  The nearly monochromatic doorknob, it tiny protrusions looming in and out of focus, takes on a sense of impossible scale, like a small, mountainous planet seen from above.  We also get a sense of its being in motion, like the slipping and sliding crystals of a kaleidoscope, or a close-up of the Hope Diamond.  And this thing is what we use to open a door?   

But the most otherworldly image in the show is not the spectral doorknob, or the gestural cloud of broken glass shards, or the color field Popsicles, it is the even more mundane empty plastic fruit tray entitled (no prizes here for titles) "4 Lb. Strawberries."  A shot from the Hubble Space telescope masquerading as a kitchen still life, "Strawberries" is the image most completely unmoored from its original source, the bottom of clear grocery package recently emptied of fruit.  Cleverly lit and placed against a black backdrop, the mural sized tray photograph is part astronomical panorama and part swirling, surrealist abstraction, with the vivid UPC sticker hovering somewhere in hyperspace like a celestial road sign - Douglas Adams would feel right at home.  It also demonstrates a feature that distinguishes this visionary work from ordinary photography.  The picture is legible in reproduction or on the web, but it doesn’t really do its work except in person and at the correct scale, where the hidden world that Layman is teasing out of his chosen household domain can emerge in its full poetry and enigma.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    FAIGIN ART REVIEWS

    ARCHIVES

    September 2024
    August 2024
    February 2023
    February 2022
    June 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    October 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    April 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004
    December 2003
    November 2003
    October 2003
    September 2003
    July 2003
    May 2003
    April 2003
    March 2003
    February 2003
    January 2003
    December 2002
    October 2002
    September 2002
    August 2002
    July 2002
    June 2002
    May 2002
    April 2002
    March 2002
    February 2002
    January 2002
    December 2001
    November 2001
    October 2001
    September 2001
    August 2001
    July 2001
    June 2001
    May 2001
    April 2001
    March 2001
    February 2001
    January 2001
    December 2000
    November 2000
    October 2000
    December 1993

Proudly powered by Weebly